<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, looking like Apple, pulls tethering apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoftheinternet.org/google-looking-like-apple-pulls-tethering-apps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/google-looking-like-apple-pulls-tethering-apps</link>
	<description>Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harris</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/google-looking-like-apple-pulls-tethering-apps/comment-page-1#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=702#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>I disagree that Google&#039;s pulling a tethering app -- or, as it appears is actually the case, limiting the carriers with which it works -- amounts to a &quot;heavy hand.&quot; As much as we&#039;d all love unfettered access to such innovative software and 24/7 wireless broadband, it&#039;s reasonable for Google to step in where the limitations of its partner networks make tethering implausible. If it&#039;s the case that T-Mobile simply can&#039;t handle the potential demands of every Android user hitting up Battlestar Galactica torrents in the local park, there&#039;s a real concern. Individual users can&#039;t be expected to limit their usage for the good of the network, so a central authority needs to act to preserve what is ultimately in everyone&#039;s interest. Given the choice, I think we&#039;d rather all of our calls / emails / texts go through all of the time than some of us have access to tethering some of the time. This is a non-evil reason to block the app.

Now that said, T-Mobile may object to tethering simply to preserve its own business in selling the same internet access to the same customers as a separate package. That&#039;s a potentially more objectionable motive, to the extent it doesn&#039;t overlap with the one described above...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that Google&#8217;s pulling a tethering app &#8212; or, as it appears is actually the case, limiting the carriers with which it works &#8212; amounts to a &#8220;heavy hand.&#8221; As much as we&#8217;d all love unfettered access to such innovative software and 24/7 wireless broadband, it&#8217;s reasonable for Google to step in where the limitations of its partner networks make tethering implausible. If it&#8217;s the case that T-Mobile simply can&#8217;t handle the potential demands of every Android user hitting up Battlestar Galactica torrents in the local park, there&#8217;s a real concern. Individual users can&#8217;t be expected to limit their usage for the good of the network, so a central authority needs to act to preserve what is ultimately in everyone&#8217;s interest. Given the choice, I think we&#8217;d rather all of our calls / emails / texts go through all of the time than some of us have access to tethering some of the time. This is a non-evil reason to block the app.</p>
<p>Now that said, T-Mobile may object to tethering simply to preserve its own business in selling the same internet access to the same customers as a separate package. That&#8217;s a potentially more objectionable motive, to the extent it doesn&#8217;t overlap with the one described above&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Murphy</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/google-looking-like-apple-pulls-tethering-apps/comment-page-1#comment-5263</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=702#comment-5263</guid>
		<description>&quot;What will happen, though, if carrier that doesn’t forbid tethering comes out with an Android-based phone? Why shouldn’t those people be able to access the [app] in the Market?&quot;

They will be able to access the app in the Market:

http://androidguys.com/?p=4418</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What will happen, though, if carrier that doesn’t forbid tethering comes out with an Android-based phone? Why shouldn’t those people be able to access the [app] in the Market?&#8221;</p>
<p>They will be able to access the app in the Market:</p>
<p><a href="http://androidguys.com/?p=4418" rel="nofollow">http://androidguys.com/?p=4418</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
