• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

Google responds to privacy critics with Google dashboard

November 10th, 2009  |  by elisabeth  |  Published in cybersecurity, Future of the Internet  |  4 Comments

Most readers of this blog probably use several Google products; my rough count is that I use about 15. Privacy advocates have been understandably concerned about having so much information stored by one company.

In partial response to these concerns, Google created the Google dashboard, a site that tells you which Google apps you use and what data they’ve stored. (From the Google home page, if you’re signed in, you can find it under Settings > Google Account Settings > Dashboard.) It’s kind of fun to browse the list—a trip down cyber-memory lane, as it were. It prompted me to finally delete the “practice blog” I set up for my intro CS class (eight years ago). Most people will probably find a few unexpected nuggets of data lurking in Google’s admin folders.

Frankly, though, I’m not sure it will make privacy advocates feel any better. Here’s why:

1. Just having a list of your accounts, data, and settings doesn’t mean it’s easy to figure out how to change anything. You have to do that within the app’s internal settings. I couldn’t figure out how to delete my Google tasks account entirely, and Robert Cringley of PC World had a similar problem with Orkut.

2. It’s nice to have all this information centralized, but most people will already know 95% of what they find on Google dashboard. People who are really concerned about privacy could have easily collected this data themselves (and probably did). John Paczkowski has more on this here. He notes that Google doesn’t show “cookie data” that is used to serve targeted ads, which an individual user couldn’t collect. However, that data is associated with browsing history, not a Google account, and it’s also clear why Google would be stingy with it. “Cookie data” is conceptually different than account information, and offering it isn’t a logical extension of Dashboard, although there could be legitimate debate about whether users should have access to data collected about their browsing habits.

3. It’s potentially useful for thieves. You have to re-enter your password to access Dashboard, so someone who happens upon your open gmail account won’t have access. But if someone gets access to your password, they’ll have a list of all the other products they should check, along with your mobile phone number, if you’ve set it as a password recovery option.

Overall: I appreciate the move towards giving users control over their data. The impulse—to develop tools that will be used by people other than hard-core privacy advocates—is a great one. This tool could use more functionality, though, particularly in making it easier to delete or manage data right from the Dashboard.

(Edited after posting to reflect more thoughts on points 2 and 3.)

—By Elisabeth Oppenheimer

Responses

Feed
  1. Saqib Ali says:

    November 10th, 2009 at 5:05 pm (#)

    Elisabeth,

    I agree that most people who are concerned with privacy would have already collected their google footprint. I did that as well. It is easy to do that once or twice, but not so convenient to perform that task on a weekly basis. Google Privacy dashboard automates the compilation process.

    But how many people will visit their privacy dashboard on a weekly basis?

    Saqib

  2. Saqib Ali says:

    November 10th, 2009 at 5:08 pm (#)

    P.S. Google sees privacy as a personal preference, not as a moral right :)

  3. arno klein says:

    December 10th, 2009 at 10:13 am (#)

    In the dashboard, you can “Clear entire Web History” and when you click “pause,” it states “This service will not collect any history until you choose to resume.”

    cheers,
    @rno

  4. Saqib Ali says:

    December 13th, 2009 at 12:05 am (#)

    After coming in #10 in the Ponemon Institute’s TRUSTe survey of most trusted companies in 2007[1], Google has remained off the list for the last two years[2,3].

    1. http://www.truste.com/pdf/2007_Most_Trusted_Companies.pdf
    2. http://www.truste.com/about_TRUSTe/press-room/news_truste_ponemon_name_trusted_companies_08.html
    3. http://www.truste.com/about_TRUSTe/press-room/news_truste_2009_most_trusted_companies_for_privacy.html

Blog

  • Dropbox Ran Afoul of Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines: So What?
  • Last week, a number of developers reported that Apple was rejecting iOS applications that used Dropbox, a popular cloud file storage and backup system. An initial thread on the Dropbox developers’ forum has led to a outpouring of tech news full of hyperbolic claims. However, none of this reporting has covered the real problem – Apple is now more concerned about protecting its business model than serving its users or its developers.  Read more »

  • Help pioneer Casebook: The Next Generation
  • We at the H2O project are seeking a full-time Project Manager. H2O is an online platform for textbook development and distribution, currently in a pilot stage. H2O is based on the open source model – instead of locking down materials in formalized textbooks, we believe that course books can be free (as in free speech) for everyone to access and, equally important, build upon.

    Using H2O, professors can freely pull together materials for a course by selecting cases, editing those cases to the sections that are most relevant, and grouping them into readings. Once the materials are assembled, they can be copied in part or in whole by other interested faculty and then edited further.  H2O has been successfully piloted in JZ’s 1L Torts class, and will be rolling out further over the coming year.

    H2O’s project manager will play a leading role in shepherding H2O into its next phase, which will focus on developing new materials and incorporating additional features, in order to expand the platform beyond its law school roots.

    H2O is a  joint project of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and the Harvard Law School library.  The Project Manager will be housed at the HLS Library and work in close collaboration with lead members of the Library Innovation Lab team; he/she will also work closely with the Berkman Center and current H2O teams. More info and job posting here.

  • Meme patrol: “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”
  • I participated in the Berkman Center’s fascinating HyperPublic symposium in the summer of 2011.  When moderating a panel I invoked the aphorism that “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”  It’s a way of encapsulating the idea that online free services usually make money by extracting lots of data from users — and then selling that data, or using it for targeted availability of those users for advertising, to advertisers.  In that sense, the advertisers are the clients, and the users enjoying free content are what’s being sold.  (Of course, sometimes that happens even when the user pays.)

    I didn’t coin the phrase, and since it was featured (and attributed to me!) in wordsmith.org’s wildly popular “word a day” as a thought for the day accompanying the word “enceinte” — I sought to nail down its provenance.

    The first use of the quote that we can find is as a comment within the famed MetaFilter community  in August 2010. The user’s name is blue_beetle, who might be someone named Andrew Lewis.  It’s entirely possible I saw it there, as MeFi is one of my five favorite sites on the Web.

    Similar sentiments (whether drawn from that source or independently invented) have been expressed by Bruce Schneier in October 2010 and by Douglas Rushkoff in September ’11.

    The phrase “you’re the product” also apparently appeared in a 1986 speech by President Reagan about the drug war.

    Just say know.

    –KA and JZ

  • OS X Mountain Lion and Gatekeeper
  • This week, Apple announced that it was moving to a new, faster OS X operating system development cycle, starting with the release of Mountain Lion next summer.  It previewed a number of features for the OS, and released some parts in beta.

    Mountain Lion is slated to include a feature called Gatekeeper as part of the security and privacy settings. Gatekeeper allows administrators (those with full privileges on a Mac) to limit the applications that can run on the Mac.  They can choose among allowing apps downloaded from the Mac App Store only, or apps from outside the Store so long as they are digitally signed to Apple’s satisfaction by their developers, or apps from anywhere.  (The latter has been the way both Mac and Windows PCs have worked, for better or worse, since the introduction of the Apple II in 1977.) Read more »

  • GPS-based Insurance Rates: The Devil is in the (Data) Details
  • A British insurance company called Motaquote has teamed up with TomTom, the GPS manufacturer to offer insurance prices based on data gathered by GPS. Fair Pay Insurance, Motaquote’s new program, is an opt-in insurance pricing scheme where drivers will get a free GPS unit in return for potentially lower (but possibly higher) premiums. The GPS unit will provide all the traditional navigational services as well as warn drivers when they corner too sharply or brake too hard. Read more »

About Jonathan Zittrain

jonathan zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

RSS Tweets from Z

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blog Archives



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.