<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of the &#8216;iPatriot Act&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act</link>
	<description>Jonathan Zittrain is the Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, and co-founder of Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet and Society.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blurring Borders &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Internet Security</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurring Borders &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Internet Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>[...] this over-regulation has already started to take place, but it could certainly get worse. To help flesh out some of the important ideas about the future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this over-regulation has already started to take place, but it could certainly get worse. To help flesh out some of the important ideas about the future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Grey</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-343</guid>
		<description>I like how they only mention (.com, .edu, and .uk).  Not (.net, or .org), and H.R. 4279 would create an IP &lt;b&gt;czar&lt;/b&gt; at the DOJ?  A czar?!  This is ridiculous.  The totalitarianism of this reeks, and that's the pungent smell of evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how they only mention (.com, .edu, and .uk).  Not (.net, or .org), and H.R. 4279 would create an IP <b>czar</b> at the DOJ?  A czar?!  This is ridiculous.  The totalitarianism of this reeks, and that&#8217;s the pungent smell of evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Professor: There’s going to be an Internet 9/11 &#171; noworldsystem.com</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Professor: There’s going to be an Internet 9/11 &#171; noworldsystem.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-303</guid>
		<description>[...] The Future of the ‘iPatriot Act’http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Future of the ‘iPatriot Act’http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot Act, The Future and Death of The Internet, etc. &#171; THE &#8220;G&#8221; BLOG @WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot Act, The Future and Death of The Internet, etc. &#171; THE &#8220;G&#8221; BLOG @WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] Future of the Internet Friday, Aug 8, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Future of the Internet Friday, Aug 8, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-294</guid>
		<description>The elite are scrambling to patch the hole that is the internet.  The emergent abilities of a global network -- and, more specifically, of a public with access to that network -- were not foreseen.  We have them at a rare and vital moment of weakness; one in which their usual and known formulas have failed.  

But we must move fast.  

They are very adept at maintaining power, and the time will not last.  We must be diligent, and move fast while we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elite are scrambling to patch the hole that is the internet.  The emergent abilities of a global network &#8212; and, more specifically, of a public with access to that network &#8212; were not foreseen.  We have them at a rare and vital moment of weakness; one in which their usual and known formulas have failed.  </p>
<p>But we must move fast.  </p>
<p>They are very adept at maintaining power, and the time will not last.  We must be diligent, and move fast while we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phree</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>phree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-292</guid>
		<description>There is no need to pass an iPatriot Act though the bills above do tighten down the surveillance conduits and make it easier for the government to block critical domains and enforce the DMCA.  The Patriot Act, Homeland Security and DMCA all contain very onerous surveillance provisions that allow any investigator to tap into your computer via the internet IP on your machine. I am a Ph.D. working on describing data-mining and surveillance technologies.  My research reveals that the deal was done in the Homeland Security Act.  The pieces of legislation above just close the door for any last minute challenges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need to pass an iPatriot Act though the bills above do tighten down the surveillance conduits and make it easier for the government to block critical domains and enforce the DMCA.  The Patriot Act, Homeland Security and DMCA all contain very onerous surveillance provisions that allow any investigator to tap into your computer via the internet IP on your machine. I am a Ph.D. working on describing data-mining and surveillance technologies.  My research reveals that the deal was done in the Homeland Security Act.  The pieces of legislation above just close the door for any last minute challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Jones&#8217; Prison Planet.com The Future of the ‘iPatriot Act’</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Jones&#8217; Prison Planet.com The Future of the ‘iPatriot Act’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-291</guid>
		<description>[...] Future of the Internet Friday, Aug 8, 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Future of the Internet Friday, Aug 8, 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>nail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-289</guid>
		<description>You can slap it around, spit on it, call it names, try to regulate it-- it's iNevitable. Not like a bad novel. No climax... just TIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can slap it around, spit on it, call it names, try to regulate it&#8211; it&#8217;s iNevitable. Not like a bad novel. No climax&#8230; just TIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Internet Security &#171; Blurring Borders</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Internet Security &#171; Blurring Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] this over-regulation has already started to take place, but it could certainly get worse. To help flesh out some of the important ideas about the future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this over-regulation has already started to take place, but it could certainly get worse. To help flesh out some of the important ideas about the future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Morris</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/the-future-of-the-ipatriot-act#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>James Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=30#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I agree with you optimism about the basic networks robustness in principle. It's more like the highway system than a tall building. 

After 9/11 I began musing that the most vulnerable targets are ones with high potential energy and/or low entropy, e.g. sky scrapers and jet fuel. The internet, after all, was conceived as a thing that could survive attacks. The giant server farms might not be a good idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you optimism about the basic networks robustness in principle. It&#8217;s more like the highway system than a tall building. </p>
<p>After 9/11 I began musing that the most vulnerable targets are ones with high potential energy and/or low entropy, e.g. sky scrapers and jet fuel. The internet, after all, was conceived as a thing that could survive attacks. The giant server farms might not be a good idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
