<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today in cybersecurity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futureoftheinternet.org/today-in-cybersecurity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/today-in-cybersecurity</link>
	<description>Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil Hatt</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/today-in-cybersecurity/comment-page-1#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=579#comment-3978</guid>
		<description>One threat that I haven&#039;t seen mention anywhere it that if a majority of arms are carried by robots, soldiers under threat (untagged as allies) won&#039;t hesitate to shoot at the source of fire, neglecting the possiblity that it&#039;s a human-operated device. Of course, this demands an already wrong scenario — but all the doom&#039;s day scenario neglect a functionning kill-switch, and we all know how JZ&#039;s generativity doesn&#039;t appeal to such projects, so they *will* include a master witch. While the mistake that I describe is simply about violent humans assuming a glitch instead of considering the possiblity of the now classic friendly fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One threat that I haven&#8217;t seen mention anywhere it that if a majority of arms are carried by robots, soldiers under threat (untagged as allies) won&#8217;t hesitate to shoot at the source of fire, neglecting the possiblity that it&#8217;s a human-operated device. Of course, this demands an already wrong scenario — but all the doom&#8217;s day scenario neglect a functionning kill-switch, and we all know how JZ&#8217;s generativity doesn&#8217;t appeal to such projects, so they *will* include a master witch. While the mistake that I describe is simply about violent humans assuming a glitch instead of considering the possiblity of the now classic friendly fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://futureoftheinternet.org/today-in-cybersecurity/comment-page-1#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futureoftheinternet.org/?p=579#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were doing something wrong, or at least &quot;a little off&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were doing something wrong, or at least &#8220;a little off&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
