• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

Why does death scare us but non-existence doesn’t?

September 9th, 2010  |  by jz  |  Published in Future of the Internet  |  5 Comments

Not exactly an Internet topic, I know, but I was struck by the Daily Dish’s call out to a post by Karl Smith:

Most people are afraid of death in a way that they are not afraid of non-existence. Thinking about the world just after your death tends to be at minimum unnerving. Thinking about the world billions of years after your death or years before you were born tends not to be so bad.

This indicates that people are concerned about the world in which they have died, not simply about the world in which they don’t exist. Indeed, most people are not troubled that they weren’t born 20 years earlier but would be saddened to know they were going to die 20 years sooner.

That sounds about right, and it’s confirmed by the fact that we can become drawn into well-fleshed-out fictional worlds like that of Avatar or Harry Potter or Middle Earth.  Good storytelling can make the characters seem real, and withdrawal from the story’s world, even if the story has with a happy ending, can make people feel a sense of, well, loss.  That might be why the least sad ending is the classic non-ending of “they all lived happily ever after.”  Ever after suggests that the story goes on and the fictional world still “exists”; we’re just no longer receiving dispatches.

It reminds me of a story by Dan Simmons in which humans have teleportation technology using small, fixed portals, and it’s become so commonplace that a wealthy person’s “house” can actually comprise multiple rooms on multiple habitable planets — walking from the dining room to the living room of a logical house actually moves someone physically from one planet to another (two sunsets in one day!).  (In the story, the plug is suddenly pulled on the whole system; suddenly Mom, who was in the kitchen making dinner, and her kids, who were watching TV in the next room, are now millions of light years away from each other, never to meet or communicate again.)

Perhaps it’s also why some can become more attached to virtual worlds rather than to the one they’re physically anchored to.  I’m intrigued by this movie about Second Life, interviewing people for whom it has become central.  With luck it’ll be in general release soon.  Until then, I’m catching GET LAMP this weekend, about the much less immersive, but still fun, worlds of text adventures.

See, this post was about the Internet after all …

…JZ

Responses

Feed
  1. ML says:

    September 9th, 2010 at 9:00 am (#)

    Zittrain,

    Second Life is irrelevant. It was never important, it will never be important. It is high time academics like us stop mentioning it.

    If you want to take a look at how people immerse themselves in virtual worlds, check out World of Warcraft horror stories. Start out at http://www.wowdetox.com, where formers players present what happened to their lives because of online gaming addicition. Search for “WoW widows” to see the complaints of wives and husbands that “lost” their loved ones to the game. Other games have the same problems, of course, but WoW is the champion in that sad area.

  2. Saqib Ali says:

    September 9th, 2010 at 10:11 am (#)

    timor mortis conturbat me

  3. Larry Sanger says:

    September 9th, 2010 at 10:13 am (#)

    It’s really pretty simple, IMHO: we fear death because we fear not doing and experiencing everything that we could do, and being with those we love, if we were to continue living. If I don’t have a good book on tape or radio program to listen to, I hate being stuck in traffic jams: that’s some of my life not being lived well. We fear death because it basically means being in a traffic jam for the rest of the time we otherwise would expect to be alive and doing things. What a horrible waste.

    This is also why prison and time-outs for kids are punishments.

    Of course, 100 years or more hence, we don’t expect to be alive. So bare non-existence, at that time, doesn’t seem tragic.

  4. seks izle says:

    September 9th, 2010 at 2:43 pm (#)

    Second Life is irrelevant. It was never important, it will never be important. It is high time academics like us stop mentioning it.

  5. Jason Scott says:

    September 10th, 2010 at 9:18 pm (#)

    The most uplifting lead-in to a mention of my movie EVER!

Blog

  • Dropbox Ran Afoul of Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines: So What?
  • Last week, a number of developers reported that Apple was rejecting iOS applications that used Dropbox, a popular cloud file storage and backup system. An initial thread on the Dropbox developers’ forum has led to a outpouring of tech news full of hyperbolic claims. However, none of this reporting has covered the real problem – Apple is now more concerned about protecting its business model than serving its users or its developers.  Read more »

  • Help pioneer Casebook: The Next Generation
  • We at the H2O project are seeking a full-time Project Manager. H2O is an online platform for textbook development and distribution, currently in a pilot stage. H2O is based on the open source model – instead of locking down materials in formalized textbooks, we believe that course books can be free (as in free speech) for everyone to access and, equally important, build upon.

    Using H2O, professors can freely pull together materials for a course by selecting cases, editing those cases to the sections that are most relevant, and grouping them into readings. Once the materials are assembled, they can be copied in part or in whole by other interested faculty and then edited further.  H2O has been successfully piloted in JZ’s 1L Torts class, and will be rolling out further over the coming year.

    H2O’s project manager will play a leading role in shepherding H2O into its next phase, which will focus on developing new materials and incorporating additional features, in order to expand the platform beyond its law school roots.

    H2O is a  joint project of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and the Harvard Law School library.  The Project Manager will be housed at the HLS Library and work in close collaboration with lead members of the Library Innovation Lab team; he/she will also work closely with the Berkman Center and current H2O teams. More info and job posting here.

  • Meme patrol: “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”
  • I participated in the Berkman Center’s fascinating HyperPublic symposium in the summer of 2011.  When moderating a panel I invoked the aphorism that “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”  It’s a way of encapsulating the idea that online free services usually make money by extracting lots of data from users — and then selling that data, or using it for targeted availability of those users for advertising, to advertisers.  In that sense, the advertisers are the clients, and the users enjoying free content are what’s being sold.  (Of course, sometimes that happens even when the user pays.)

    I didn’t coin the phrase, and since it was featured (and attributed to me!) in wordsmith.org’s wildly popular “word a day” as a thought for the day accompanying the word “enceinte” — I sought to nail down its provenance.

    The first use of the quote that we can find is as a comment within the famed MetaFilter community  in August 2010. The user’s name is blue_beetle, who might be someone named Andrew Lewis.  It’s entirely possible I saw it there, as MeFi is one of my five favorite sites on the Web.

    Similar sentiments (whether drawn from that source or independently invented) have been expressed by Bruce Schneier in October 2010 and by Douglas Rushkoff in September ’11.

    The phrase “you’re the product” also apparently appeared in a 1986 speech by President Reagan about the drug war.

    Just say know.

    –KA and JZ

  • OS X Mountain Lion and Gatekeeper
  • This week, Apple announced that it was moving to a new, faster OS X operating system development cycle, starting with the release of Mountain Lion next summer.  It previewed a number of features for the OS, and released some parts in beta.

    Mountain Lion is slated to include a feature called Gatekeeper as part of the security and privacy settings. Gatekeeper allows administrators (those with full privileges on a Mac) to limit the applications that can run on the Mac.  They can choose among allowing apps downloaded from the Mac App Store only, or apps from outside the Store so long as they are digitally signed to Apple’s satisfaction by their developers, or apps from anywhere.  (The latter has been the way both Mac and Windows PCs have worked, for better or worse, since the introduction of the Apple II in 1977.) Read more »

  • GPS-based Insurance Rates: The Devil is in the (Data) Details
  • A British insurance company called Motaquote has teamed up with TomTom, the GPS manufacturer to offer insurance prices based on data gathered by GPS. Fair Pay Insurance, Motaquote’s new program, is an opt-in insurance pricing scheme where drivers will get a free GPS unit in return for potentially lower (but possibly higher) premiums. The GPS unit will provide all the traditional navigational services as well as warn drivers when they corner too sharply or brake too hard. Read more »

About Jonathan Zittrain

jonathan zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

RSS Tweets from Z

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blog Archives



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.