• Home
  • About
  • Blog (ARCHIVE)
  • News (ARCHIVE)
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

This site has been archived and will not be updated further. Jonathan Zittrain’s new personal website is accessible at https://blogs.harvard.edu/jzwrites/

This extraordinary book explains the engine that has catapulted the Internet from backwater to ubiquity—and reveals that it is sputtering precisely because of its runaway success. With the unwitting help of its users, the generative Internet is on a path to a lockdown, ending its cycle of innovation—and facilitating unsettling new kinds of control.

IPods, iPhones, Xboxes, and TiVos represent the first wave of Internet-centered products that can’t be easily modified by anyone except their vendors or selected partners. These “tethered appliances” have already been used in remarkable but little-known ways: car GPS systems have been reconfigured at the demand of law enforcement to eavesdrop on the occupants at all times, and digital video recorders have been ordered to self-destruct thanks to a lawsuit against the manufacturer thousands of miles away. New Web 2.0 platforms like Google mash-ups and Facebook are rightly touted—but their applications can be similarly monitored and eliminated from a central source. As tethered appliances and applications eclipse the PC, the very nature of the Internet—its “generativity,” or innovative character—is at risk.

The Internet’s current trajectory is one of lost opportunity. Its salvation, Zittrain argues, lies in the hands of its millions of users. Drawing on generative technologies like Wikipedia that have so far survived their own successes, this book shows how to develop new technologies and social structures that allow users to work creatively and collaboratively, participate in solutions, and become true “netizens.”

Future of the Internet Blog

  • A novel way of defending against mass uses of our data
  • AI is getting better at performing mass categorization of photos and text. A developer can scrape a bunch of photos from, say, Facebook -- either directly, likely violating the terms of service, or through offering an app by which people ...
  • Should the director of OPM be fired over its massive data breach?
  • I participate in a regular poll by the Christian Science Monitor on Internet policy topics.  This week's question was about the recent data breaches at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management: As you can see, most people said yes.  I count myself ...

Blog Archives

 

@prestonjbyrne @mmasnick @questauthority @elonmusk What does it say that with your tweet (and tag) the odds of that happening are now >0?

About 2 hours ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@prestonjbyrne @mmasnick @questauthority Yep! And how many people would reasonably understand that they need to click through to see which “type” of verification is being indicated, when the whole reason that it’s only in the fine print is so that the paid one can absorb the value and meaning of the traditional one!

About 2 hours ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@questauthority @blakereid @mmasnick I figure it depends on the circumstance. Where the statement wouldn’t defame X if not falsely attributed to X, but does if it is, the credible attribution is the act of defamation against X. And that’s an utterance by Twitter directly, not just by the spoof account.

About 2 hours ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@prestonjbyrne @mmasnick @questauthority Yea, I’m with Antone on this. They are bound by what they’ve represented, and if they’re changing what it means, they have to make it clear. Or just use a different icon! Which, tellingly, would defeat the purpose/value of the $8 program. twitter.com/antonejohnson/…

About 2 hours ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@prestonjbyrne @mmasnick @questauthority … if that’s true, then the only Q is whether the blue check is materially equivalent to that in the eyes of a reasonable reader. At least during this … transition? … period I think it very much could be, irrespective of what the fine print says about blue checks rn.

About 2 hours ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone


Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.
Protected by Akismet • Blog with WordPress