• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

FOI Topics and Links of the Week

August 10th, 2010  |  by Jennifer  |  Published in Android, cybersecurity, Future of the Internet, Generativity, privacy, wikipedia  |  2 Comments

Game on. A featureless update released recently by TI blocks a hack that allowed owners to write their own programs for the company’s Nspire calculator. It’s not immediately obvious what rationale TI used to justify the block. It isn’t under pressure to protect the commercial interests of a partner service provider. And worst case, a buggy calculator isn’t exactly as calamitous as a compromised cell phone. In any event, the competition illustrates what may become an increasingly common arms race between hardware companies trying to lock down their products and consumers who want to load the software of their choice on a device they own.

Disintegrating Droids. The Droid X comes pre-loaded with eFuse technology, which prevents it from booting with unapproved software. Motorola points out that triggering eFuse doesn’t permanently disable the phone — it can re-boot once approved software is reinstalled. Much better.

Neighborhood watch for software vulnerabilities. At the Black Hat security conference last week, Microsoft advocated for cooperation between software companies, researchers, and security vendors to share information on flaws and patches in order to keep users safe. Perhaps cross-pollination at the meeting will spread the idea of mutual aid to website owners as well.

Researcher remotely hacks ATMs. Also at Black Hat, a security researcher demonstrated that he could remotely order stand-alone ATMs to spew cash. While causing a remote ATM to dispense money at will is less appealing to the average thief than cracking open a proximate machine, an accomplice with a laptop in a van nearby could make it a profitable endeavor.

Apple rejects iPad magazine subscription app. Apple has nixed an app from Time, Inc. that would have allowed iPad owners to purchase a digital subscription to Sports Illustrated. Peter Kafka of Media Memo hypothesizes that Apple doesn’t want to give magazine publishers the access to personal user information they would have with an app. But publishers are likely salivating over the targeted advertising potential of mining that data. Plus, single-issue sales through iTunes are cumbersome and inefficient. There may be a confrontation brewing, unless publishers are willing to be satisfied with whatever options Apple grants them.

FBI challenges Wikipedia over logo. This week, the FBI accused Wikipedia of illegally displaying the agency’s official seal. Wikipedia has refused to remove the image from its FBI page. Wikipedians have a history of standing firm on controversial articles. It’s unclear whether a specific incident triggered agency action. The BBC notes that since the seal is published elsewhere on the Web, the FBI’s selective targeting of Wikipedia is also mysterious. And many reports on the story now include . . . images of the seal.
Zombie cookie revenge. A lawsuit filed in federal court alleges that several prominent websites used Flash or “zombie” cookies to surreptitiously collect personal user information. Flash cookies can re-create browser cookies deleted by users. They function as extra storage for websites and maintain user preferences, but can also be exploited to track users online.
—By Jennifer Halbleib

Responses

Feed
  1. Seth Finkelstein says:

    August 10th, 2010 at 11:29 am (#)

    I actually talked with an FBI spokesperson. Regarding the reason they took action about Wikimedia, he said they act when they receive a specific complaint, and someone had made a complaint about them.

  2. Seth Johnson says:

    August 17th, 2010 at 12:07 pm (#)

    Re: Disintegrating Droids: It’s only better if it’s clear that these are not computers, and are owned by Motorola, whose encryption key is burned into the motherboard to control what you can do with information on the device.

Blog

  • Controlling Cyberspace
  • This semester, we’re starting an exciting new class, aimed not at lawyers, but undergraduate CS students here at Harvard. It’s called CS42: Controlling Cyberspace – and we’re sharing the syllabus online.  Anything big we’re missing? Read more »

  • Computers Going Wild?
  • Computers Gone Wild: Impact and Implications of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Society was an informal discussion that took place at Harvard Law School on December 8th, 2011. Hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Marin Soljačić and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, we brought together eighteen mostly local guests to discuss the ways that AI is changing society. Unlike futuristic predictions involving the Singularity or the underlying technology, this workshop explored current technology. Sessions included discussions on warfare, finance, education, and labor. Below is a list of attendees and a summary of the discussion.

    Read more »

  • Ideas for a Better Internet
  • Ideas for a Better Internet, or i4bi, is an interdisciplinary course at Harvard and Stanford that challenges students from law, computer science, and public policy to come up with novel and plausible ways to improve the Internet and its use. i4bi centers on immersing participants in Internet history, technologies, and politics, so that students can come up with ideas that help to build a better Internet — however they define “better.” Read more »
  • Microsoft Echoes Apple App Store Requirements
  • Here at Future of the Internet, we’ve already talked a little bit about Apple’s content requirements for both the iOS and Mac App Stores in JZ’s The PC is Dead post. As JZ said,

    “Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Mark Fiore found his iPhone app rejected because it contained “content that ridicules public figures.” Fiore was well-known enough that the rejection raised eyebrows, and Apple later reversed its decision. But the fact that apps must routinely face approval masks how extraordinary the situation is: tech companies are in the business of approving, one by one, the text, images, and sounds that we are permitted to find and experience on our most common portals to the networked world. Why would we possibly want this to be how the world of ideas works, and why would we think that merely having competing tech companies—each of which is empowered to censor—solves the problem?”

    Apple’s approach is an example of a larger phenomenon. Read more »

  • A SOPA compromise is floated
  • Last week several members of Congress — Senators Wyden, Cantwell, Moran, and Paul, and Reps. Issa, Lofgren and Chaffetz — floated a proposal to substitute for the contentious proposed Stop Online Piracy Act, previously discussed here.  Sen. Wyden’s office has commented on the compromise, and TechDirt has a writeup and a copy of the document here. The proposal omits the elements of SOPA that had run into the most resistance. Gone is tinkering with fundamental Internet architecture such as the use of the domain name system. Gone is the involvement of the Attorney General. Gone is the criminal copyright streaming provision that could, theoretically, make a teenage Justin Bieber a felon for streaming amateur videos featuring his renditions of songs by his favorite artists.In all these ways, the Wyden compromise is significantly better than SOPA. So what’s left? Read more »
About Jonathan Zittrain

jonathan zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

RSS Tweets from Z

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blog Archives



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.