- Dropbox Ran Afoul of Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines: So What?
Last week, a number of developers reported that Apple was rejecting iOS applications that used Dropbox, a popular cloud file storage and backup system. An initial thread on the Dropbox developers’ forum has led to a outpouring of tech news full of hyperbolic claims. However, none of this reporting has covered the real problem – Apple is now more concerned about protecting its business model than serving its users or its developers. Read more »
- Help pioneer Casebook: The Next Generation
We at the H2O project are seeking a full-time Project Manager. H2O is an online platform for textbook development and distribution, currently in a pilot stage. H2O is based on the open source model – instead of locking down materials in formalized textbooks, we believe that course books can be free (as in free speech) for everyone to access and, equally important, build upon.
Using H2O, professors can freely pull together materials for a course by selecting cases, editing those cases to the sections that are most relevant, and grouping them into readings. Once the materials are assembled, they can be copied in part or in whole by other interested faculty and then edited further. H2O has been successfully piloted in JZ’s 1L Torts class, and will be rolling out further over the coming year.
H2O’s project manager will play a leading role in shepherding H2O into its next phase, which will focus on developing new materials and incorporating additional features, in order to expand the platform beyond its law school roots.
H2O is a joint project of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and the Harvard Law School library. The Project Manager will be housed at the HLS Library and work in close collaboration with lead members of the Library Innovation Lab team; he/she will also work closely with the Berkman Center and current H2O teams. More info and job posting here.
- Meme patrol: “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”
I participated in the Berkman Center’s fascinating HyperPublic symposium in the summer of 2011. When moderating a panel I invoked the aphorism that “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.” It’s a way of encapsulating the idea that online free services usually make money by extracting lots of data from users — and then selling that data, or using it for targeted availability of those users for advertising, to advertisers. In that sense, the advertisers are the clients, and the users enjoying free content are what’s being sold. (Of course, sometimes that happens even when the user pays.)
I didn’t coin the phrase, and since it was featured (and attributed to me!) in wordsmith.org’s wildly popular “word a day” as a thought for the day accompanying the word “enceinte” — I sought to nail down its provenance.
The first use of the quote that we can find is as a comment within the famed MetaFilter community in August 2010. The user’s name is blue_beetle, who might be someone named Andrew Lewis. It’s entirely possible I saw it there, as MeFi is one of my five favorite sites on the Web.
Similar sentiments (whether drawn from that source or independently invented) have been expressed by Bruce Schneier in October 2010 and by Douglas Rushkoff in September ’11.
The phrase “you’re the product” also apparently appeared in a 1986 speech by President Reagan about the drug war.
Just say know.
–KA and JZ
- OS X Mountain Lion and Gatekeeper
This week, Apple announced that it was moving to a new, faster OS X operating system development cycle, starting with the release of Mountain Lion next summer. It previewed a number of features for the OS, and released some parts in beta.
Mountain Lion is slated to include a feature called Gatekeeper as part of the security and privacy settings. Gatekeeper allows administrators (those with full privileges on a Mac) to limit the applications that can run on the Mac. They can choose among allowing apps downloaded from the Mac App Store only, or apps from outside the Store so long as they are digitally signed to Apple’s satisfaction by their developers, or apps from anywhere. (The latter has been the way both Mac and Windows PCs have worked, for better or worse, since the introduction of the Apple II in 1977.) Read more »
- GPS-based Insurance Rates: The Devil is in the (Data) Details
A British insurance company called Motaquote has teamed up with TomTom, the GPS manufacturer to offer insurance prices based on data gathered by GPS. Fair Pay Insurance, Motaquote’s new program, is an opt-in insurance pricing scheme where drivers will get a free GPS unit in return for potentially lower (but possibly higher) premiums. The GPS unit will provide all the traditional navigational services as well as warn drivers when they corner too sharply or brake too hard. Read more »
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:56 pm (#)
“What will happen, though, if carrier that doesn’t forbid tethering comes out with an Android-based phone? Why shouldn’t those people be able to access the [app] in the Market?”
They will be able to access the app in the Market:
http://androidguys.com/?p=4418
April 4th, 2009 at 4:08 pm (#)
I disagree that Google’s pulling a tethering app — or, as it appears is actually the case, limiting the carriers with which it works — amounts to a “heavy hand.” As much as we’d all love unfettered access to such innovative software and 24/7 wireless broadband, it’s reasonable for Google to step in where the limitations of its partner networks make tethering implausible. If it’s the case that T-Mobile simply can’t handle the potential demands of every Android user hitting up Battlestar Galactica torrents in the local park, there’s a real concern. Individual users can’t be expected to limit their usage for the good of the network, so a central authority needs to act to preserve what is ultimately in everyone’s interest. Given the choice, I think we’d rather all of our calls / emails / texts go through all of the time than some of us have access to tethering some of the time. This is a non-evil reason to block the app.
Now that said, T-Mobile may object to tethering simply to preserve its own business in selling the same internet access to the same customers as a separate package. That’s a potentially more objectionable motive, to the extent it doesn’t overlap with the one described above…