• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

Bloggers use Herdict to monitor China

March 7th, 2009  |  by Yvette Wohn  |  Published in Herdict  |  3 Comments

by Yvette Wohn

Speaking at the Berkman Center earlier this year before the official launch of Herdict, Prof. Z described Herdict’s potential as being a real-time tool for mapping web filtering activities around the world. “Should it start producing a map of filtering as it happens, I think it will have a major impact,” he said.

Several weeks into the official launch, people are using Herdict to monitor website blockages around the world– and not just because they’re bored.

As the 50th anniversary of the Tibetan uprising in China (and one-year anniversary of the Tibet riots) draws near, bloggers are pointing out increased inaccessibility in China of U.S.-based web services such as Twitter and Youtube, using Herdict data that shows statistical trends and information of the IP addresses where the blockage is happening (examples here and here). One blogger used Herdict data to create a visual representation of accessibility within China on a political map.

Of course one could find information about web blockage of YouTube in China on Twitter or in discussion forums, which reflects personal experiences. Herdict, however, aggregates that data from a self-reporting crowd and presents it in a manner that makes it easy to analyze trends.

I know this all sounds great, but what happens when China wants to block Herdict for reporting which sites are getting blocked? Z hopes that in the near future, the concept of knowing which sites are accessible or not will be something people take for granted.

Think of something that starts as inane as you can imagine. Herdict doesn’t get much more inane than Twitter or Wikipedia, where months later you say “How do we ever get on without this?” I would like to see this in that category, that provides a momentum onto itself–  now that it’s invented, it’s too good of an idea so that if you shut it down, someone else is going to write it. My idea is that when that is established, it’s obvious that this is part of the functioning Internet– to know where you can get to and why.

Responses

Feed
  1. Moving From Me To We.com » Blog Archive » Now You Can Help Stop Censorship… says:

    March 9th, 2009 at 2:34 pm (#)

    [...] is not just the usual suspects like China that appear to censor online communication.  The Netherlands has “126 reports of [...]

  2. herdict.org - the herdometer « hep-cat.de says:

    March 10th, 2009 at 7:35 am (#)

    [...] in Echtzeit ermittelt werden, welche Seiten von welechem Ort der Erde nicht erreichbar sind, wobei China leider wieder mal heraussticht. Momentan ist das Ganze natürlich noch BETA und mir ist schleierhaft, wie verhindert werden soll, [...]

  3. Ariyes says:

    March 18th, 2009 at 10:47 am (#)

    seriously guys idid not know anything about Herdict before i read this post. still i am not fully clear about this but reading this post i understood that it’s work is to map web filtering activities and monitor website blockages. that’s it. I love this blog because it gives me new information like this and the news are authentic.

Blog

  • Controlling Cyberspace
  • This semester, we’re starting an exciting new class, aimed not at lawyers, but undergraduate CS students here at Harvard. It’s called CS42: Controlling Cyberspace – and we’re sharing the syllabus online.  Anything big we’re missing? Read more »

  • Computers Going Wild?
  • Computers Gone Wild: Impact and Implications of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Society was an informal discussion that took place at Harvard Law School on December 8th, 2011. Hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Marin Soljačić and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, we brought together eighteen mostly local guests to discuss the ways that AI is changing society. Unlike futuristic predictions involving the Singularity or the underlying technology, this workshop explored current technology. Sessions included discussions on warfare, finance, education, and labor. Below is a list of attendees and a summary of the discussion.

    Read more »

  • Ideas for a Better Internet
  • Ideas for a Better Internet, or i4bi, is an interdisciplinary course at Harvard and Stanford that challenges students from law, computer science, and public policy to come up with novel and plausible ways to improve the Internet and its use. i4bi centers on immersing participants in Internet history, technologies, and politics, so that students can come up with ideas that help to build a better Internet — however they define “better.” Read more »
  • Microsoft Echoes Apple App Store Requirements
  • Here at Future of the Internet, we’ve already talked a little bit about Apple’s content requirements for both the iOS and Mac App Stores in JZ’s The PC is Dead post. As JZ said,

    “Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Mark Fiore found his iPhone app rejected because it contained “content that ridicules public figures.” Fiore was well-known enough that the rejection raised eyebrows, and Apple later reversed its decision. But the fact that apps must routinely face approval masks how extraordinary the situation is: tech companies are in the business of approving, one by one, the text, images, and sounds that we are permitted to find and experience on our most common portals to the networked world. Why would we possibly want this to be how the world of ideas works, and why would we think that merely having competing tech companies—each of which is empowered to censor—solves the problem?”

    Apple’s approach is an example of a larger phenomenon. Read more »

  • A SOPA compromise is floated
  • Last week several members of Congress — Senators Wyden, Cantwell, Moran, and Paul, and Reps. Issa, Lofgren and Chaffetz — floated a proposal to substitute for the contentious proposed Stop Online Piracy Act, previously discussed here.  Sen. Wyden’s office has commented on the compromise, and TechDirt has a writeup and a copy of the document here. The proposal omits the elements of SOPA that had run into the most resistance. Gone is tinkering with fundamental Internet architecture such as the use of the domain name system. Gone is the involvement of the Attorney General. Gone is the criminal copyright streaming provision that could, theoretically, make a teenage Justin Bieber a felon for streaming amateur videos featuring his renditions of songs by his favorite artists.In all these ways, the Wyden compromise is significantly better than SOPA. So what’s left? Read more »
About Jonathan Zittrain

jonathan zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

RSS Tweets from Z

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blog Archives



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.