Protect your PC, Protect our Network, Protect the Internet: JOIN Herdict :: The Future of the Internet

Protect your PC, Protect our Network, Protect the Internet: JOIN Herdict

August 6th, 2008 | by epeterson | Published in Herdict | 4 Comments

This fall the Berkman Center for Internet and Society (and JZ’s new home) will unveil Herdict, a suite of programs that gathers data from users around the world about their PCs’ performance and ability to access websites. Herdict aggregates this information and aims to provide a real time picture of users’ PC health and web accessibility. If you read The Future of the Internet or saw some of the interviews, or came to Berkman@10, Herdict is the “take away.” For the Internet we know and love is under attack. The openness that allowed users to write any software they wanted, run that software on any machine, and share that software with anyone who wanted it created a lot of great code: Google, Facebook, etc. But that same openness also encouraged a lot of bad code: malware, badware, bots, and so forth. In an effort to protect themselves from this bad code, users are moving from open, “generative” technologies (PC’s) to closed, “tethered” ones (TiVo’s). These tethered appliances give users security but at the price of innovation.

Our current focus is on Herdict for Network Health. Netizens will be able to report any web sites they cannot access through the Herdict website or Firefox/IE plug-in.

By aggregating individuals’ reports across the Internet, Network Health strives to create a real-time picture of network accessibility. Users will be able to read reports of inaccessibility by region or by country, or track specific web sites over time:

Using this information Network Health users will then be able to start diagnosing why sites are inaccessible – network failure, government censorship, or something else – through the OpenNet Initiative.
But Network Health is just one application in the Herdict suite. PC Health, which is still in development, will allow users to track information about their computers’ performance and compare it to the performance of other computers on the network. For example, if PC Health tells a user that her computer is running poorly in comparison to other computers on the network, it might be an indication that she has badwares in her computer. Or if PC Health finds that all the computers with a certain piece of software are running poorly, it might be an indication that the specific software is bad.

Herdict is a collaborative effort: its success relies on the participation of internet crowds. So become a publicist. Link to Herdict on your blog. Share the program with friends. Help make contacts with traditional and online media outlets. And visit our web site for updates.

The Internet will not save itself. Herdict will help us use open technologies responsibly, and help us protect what makes the Internet so great.

(disclaimer: pictures are for illustration purposes. Design and content might change)

Responses

Feed

Mark says:

August 10th, 2008 at 1:24 pm (#)

Irony abounds. I have installed Herdict because it comes from the Berkman Center and trust you guys. But I have no insight into what has been installed. The Terms and Conditions seem very proprietary. What’s up with that? I’m feeding information to the OpenNet Initiative using an application that is anything but open. I put all kind of trash on my computer and I am no where near as cautious as I should be but I would expect something coming from you guys would be a lot more transparent than this…just sayin’.

- Mark
Vandana Aneja says:

August 13th, 2008 at 11:21 am (#)

Mark,

Thanks for the feedback. This release is a pre-alpha version and though we have a Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions, they are not perfect and still being developed. As you rightly point out, they are in “legal speak”. We intend to develop a FAQs that will address questions such as yours, with the goal to disclose all information in a non-legal fashion.

-Vandana
(Herdict team)
Peter says:

September 10th, 2008 at 1:50 pm (#)

Interesting project….will Mac OS be allowed to play? Linux and its gaggle? It would be interesting to compare results across platforms.
Greg says:

May 24th, 2009 at 4:53 am (#)

Many people sympathetic to your concerns are probably free software fans who are running a version of GNU/Linux. As Peter suggested in an earlier post, a Linux version of Herdict PC might be interesting, if only to enable comparisons between the safety of Linux and other OSs. Any plans?

Blog

Controlling Cyberspace

This semester, we’re starting an exciting new class, aimed not at lawyers, but undergraduate CS students here at Harvard. It’s called CS42: Controlling Cyberspace – and we’re sharing the syllabus online. Anything big we’re missing? Read more »

Computers Going Wild?

Computers Gone Wild: Impact and Implications of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Society was an informal discussion that took place at Harvard Law School on December 8^th, 2011. Hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Marin Soljačić and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, we brought together eighteen mostly local guests to discuss the ways that AI is changing society. Unlike futuristic predictions involving the Singularity or the underlying technology, this workshop explored current technology. Sessions included discussions on warfare, finance, education, and labor. Below is a list of attendees and a summary of the discussion.

Ideas for a Better Internet

Ideas for a Better Internet, or i4bi, is an interdisciplinary course at Harvard and Stanford that challenges students from law, computer science, and public policy to come up with novel and plausible ways to improve the Internet and its use. i4bi centers on immersing participants in Internet history, technologies, and politics, so that students can come up with ideas that help to build a better Internet — however they define “better.” Read more »

Microsoft Echoes Apple App Store Requirements

Here at Future of the Internet, we’ve already talked a little bit about Apple’s content requirements for both the iOS and Mac App Stores in JZ’s The PC is Dead post. As JZ said,

“Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Mark Fiore found his iPhone app rejected because it contained “content that ridicules public figures.” Fiore was well-known enough that the rejection raised eyebrows, and Apple later reversed its decision. But the fact that apps must routinely face approval masks how extraordinary the situation is: tech companies are in the business of approving, one by one, the text, images, and sounds that we are permitted to find and experience on our most common portals to the networked world. Why would we possibly want this to be how the world of ideas works, and why would we think that merely having competing tech companies—each of which is empowered to censor—solves the problem?”

Apple’s approach is an example of a larger phenomenon. Read more »

A SOPA compromise is floated

Last week several members of Congress — Senators Wyden, Cantwell, Moran, and Paul, and Reps. Issa, Lofgren and Chaffetz — floated a proposal to substitute for the contentious proposed Stop Online Piracy Act, previously discussed here. Sen. Wyden’s office has commented on the compromise, and TechDirt has a writeup and a copy of the document here. The proposal omits the elements of SOPA that had run into the most resistance. Gone is tinkering with fundamental Internet architecture such as the use of the domain name system. Gone is the involvement of the Attorney General. Gone is the criminal copyright streaming provision that could, theoretically, make a teenage Justin Bieber a felon for streaming amateur videos featuring his renditions of songs by his favorite artists.In all these ways, the Wyden compromise is significantly better than SOPA. So what’s left? Read more »

About Jonathan Zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

Tweets from Z

An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.