• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

Why the PC matters

June 18th, 2009  |  by jz  |  Published in Book, Future of the Internet, iran cyberwar  |  5 Comments

One less examined piece of what’s going on in Iran this week goes beyond the use of Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms — beyond what people can do with a basic browser.  And that’s the role of the humble PC — the personal computer, whether Windows, Mac, or GNU/Linux. What makes the PC so crucial is that it’s a “generative” technology, i.e. one that can be repurposed by its user at any time by simply installing new software.  Without it, those in Iran wanting to get to blocked information would be mostly restricted to visiting Web sites that aren’t blocked and hoping that they can connect to those that are — the way that Twitterfall can be used to tweet even if twitter.com is blocked, or visiting an anonymizer like anonymizer.com.

Of course, those can be blocked too, and often are.  Twitter’s ancillary sites are working — to the extent they still are — only because the censors have their hands full at the moment.  But the PC changes the equation on both sides: within and outside of Iran.

Inside Iran, people can load new software on their PCs to try to get around blocks.  Find a copy of something like the xB browser online, or modify your current browser to work with software like Tor, and you can try directing all your Web access through intermediaries that aren’t blocked.  If you find one that works, all your surfing can end up unblocked.  If people were using today’s mobile phones for Internet access instead of PCs, this wouldn’t be possible, because most mobile phones, even if they can hook up to a wireless Internet access point, won’t run outside code, or only run outside code approved by the vendor.  (The jury’s still out on how easily one can install outside code on a phone running Google’s Android OS.)

Even more important than the options available to someone inside Iran are the options for those everywhere else.  Many people have been eager to show support for those in Iran who want to evade the government clampdown on news, both in and out.  Thanks to the PC they can do more than color their personal avatars green.  If you have a PC and want to help, you can find instructions on how to download software that will turn your PC into a way station between Iranian citizens and the rest of the Net.  Two minutes ago you were playing Quake, and now you’re donating bandwidth and computing cycles to the free movement of bits — and you can even go back to playing Quake again.  And discussions are under way to reconfigure the just-released free Opera browser so it can serve as a proxy. [Update: Al Billings at Mozilla is thinking through the same questions for Firefox.]

That’s extraordinary.  The computing machines we buy are descendants of the old hobbyist machines of the 1980′s, which assumed people would get them so they could tinker with them, and those vestiges turn out to be crucial at a time like this.  We’re lucky to still have so many home PCs out there.  Our work ones are often locked down — your neighborhood IT department would have a heart attack if it found you running a proxy server, since it would worry about the security of the corporate intranet.  Most schools don’t allow their students to run new code in a computer cluster, and libraries are locked down, too.  (Indeed, all three of these places typically have their own content filters installed!)  Thanks to the PC, people can help forge new civic technologies — ones that succeed to the extent that people are willing to participate in them.

Perhaps soon we’ll see even more profound ways to transform access to the information grid.  Researchers have been puzzling through “wireless ad hoc mesh networking,” which allows devices to connect to each other without needing an Internet Service Provider to run interference.  If anyone is connected to the larger Internet, everyone else nearby — and everyone near everyone else nearby, etc. — can connect.  This is the method used by the One Laptop Per Child project to allow the PCs they are sending to kids in developing countries to share data with one another even if there’s no Internet drop point available.  Imagine that technology redeployed to this situation — and it can be, if someone writes or adapts the right software.  Our PCs have radios in them that can talk to one another, not just to an “official” access point; you may even recall seeing others’ computers in your wi-fi access list when trying to find a way to get online while on the road.  A little tweak here and there and it can start working — for school kids in Brazil, for hurricane refugees running laptops on battery power, and for citizens in Iran facing otherwise-limited Net access.

A green avatar is just the beginning — so long as we maintain our somewhat accidental ubiquitous infrastructure of generative, reprogrammable boxes, a legion of hackers ready to reprogram them to social ends, and a citizenry ready to donate some bandwidth and cycles to a good cause.

Responses

Feed
  1. Open Buddha » Blog Archive » So much for enabling freedom! says:

    June 18th, 2009 at 7:46 pm (#)

    [...] Zittrain has posted in relation to this matter as well. I seem to be timely as this just went up: Why the PC matters. This entry was posted on Thursday, June 18th, 2009 at 5:21 pm and is filed under Mozilla, [...]

  2. Seth Finkelstein says:

    June 19th, 2009 at 1:37 am (#)

    You already know this, but just for the audience:

    From my review of Access Denied:

    “if parents can limit what teenagers can see, then governments will be
    able to limit what citizens can see. And the other side is if citizens can circumvent governments, teenagers will be able to circumvent parents.”

    Pick one. Can’t have both.

  3. Andrew says:

    June 19th, 2009 at 4:55 am (#)

    Just a quick note that Tor has a completely configured, self-contained, 1-click way to use Tor now, called the Tor Browser Bundle. It includes an IM client, Firefox, and all the back-end plumbing you need to use Tor without having to configure anything. No need to “modify your current browser”.

    See https://torproject.org/torbrowser for more details.

  4. Computers can lead…a revolution-Jonathan Zittrain « FACT – Freedom Against Censorship Thailand says:

    June 20th, 2009 at 10:52 am (#)

    [...] 20-06-09 Why the PC matters [...]

  5. Andy says:

    June 20th, 2009 at 2:00 pm (#)

    In Europe Wireless Mesh is perceived as a very technical term but everyone knows Freifunk and the community associations of “having your own antenna”. In Berlin Wireless Mesh Networks are quite popular across the city as we have the Freifunk movement center here, it is real community work and it also shows why. Same in Italy. Patricia Toia wrote up a telecom spectrum bill for the Strasbourg European Parliament that was passed last year. Wireless mesh was in there. It was a great showcase to ge the OLPC project adopt Freifunk technologies. I remember the World Summit on the Information Society in Geneva where the internet access was plain crap, the OLPC project was kind of launched there. Freifunk looks like the natural thing to do with a wifi adapter.

    http://blog.freifunk.net/video

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-0451

Blog

  • Controlling Cyberspace
  • This semester, we’re starting an exciting new class, aimed not at lawyers, but undergraduate CS students here at Harvard. It’s called CS42: Controlling Cyberspace – and we’re sharing the syllabus online.  Anything big we’re missing? Read more »

  • Computers Going Wild?
  • Computers Gone Wild: Impact and Implications of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Society was an informal discussion that took place at Harvard Law School on December 8th, 2011. Hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Marin Soljačić and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, we brought together eighteen mostly local guests to discuss the ways that AI is changing society. Unlike futuristic predictions involving the Singularity or the underlying technology, this workshop explored current technology. Sessions included discussions on warfare, finance, education, and labor. Below is a list of attendees and a summary of the discussion.

    Read more »

  • Ideas for a Better Internet
  • Ideas for a Better Internet, or i4bi, is an interdisciplinary course at Harvard and Stanford that challenges students from law, computer science, and public policy to come up with novel and plausible ways to improve the Internet and its use. i4bi centers on immersing participants in Internet history, technologies, and politics, so that students can come up with ideas that help to build a better Internet — however they define “better.” Read more »
  • Microsoft Echoes Apple App Store Requirements
  • Here at Future of the Internet, we’ve already talked a little bit about Apple’s content requirements for both the iOS and Mac App Stores in JZ’s The PC is Dead post. As JZ said,

    “Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Mark Fiore found his iPhone app rejected because it contained “content that ridicules public figures.” Fiore was well-known enough that the rejection raised eyebrows, and Apple later reversed its decision. But the fact that apps must routinely face approval masks how extraordinary the situation is: tech companies are in the business of approving, one by one, the text, images, and sounds that we are permitted to find and experience on our most common portals to the networked world. Why would we possibly want this to be how the world of ideas works, and why would we think that merely having competing tech companies—each of which is empowered to censor—solves the problem?”

    Apple’s approach is an example of a larger phenomenon. Read more »

  • A SOPA compromise is floated
  • Last week several members of Congress — Senators Wyden, Cantwell, Moran, and Paul, and Reps. Issa, Lofgren and Chaffetz — floated a proposal to substitute for the contentious proposed Stop Online Piracy Act, previously discussed here.  Sen. Wyden’s office has commented on the compromise, and TechDirt has a writeup and a copy of the document here. The proposal omits the elements of SOPA that had run into the most resistance. Gone is tinkering with fundamental Internet architecture such as the use of the domain name system. Gone is the involvement of the Attorney General. Gone is the criminal copyright streaming provision that could, theoretically, make a teenage Justin Bieber a felon for streaming amateur videos featuring his renditions of songs by his favorite artists.In all these ways, the Wyden compromise is significantly better than SOPA. So what’s left? Read more »
About Jonathan Zittrain

jonathan zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School

RSS Tweets from Z

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blog Archives



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.