- Dropbox Ran Afoul of Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines: So What?
Last week, a number of developers reported that Apple was rejecting iOS applications that used Dropbox, a popular cloud file storage and backup system. An initial thread on the Dropbox developers’ forum has led to a outpouring of tech news full of hyperbolic claims. However, none of this reporting has covered the real problem – Apple is now more concerned about protecting its business model than serving its users or its developers. Read more »
- Help pioneer Casebook: The Next Generation
We at the H2O project are seeking a full-time Project Manager. H2O is an online platform for textbook development and distribution, currently in a pilot stage. H2O is based on the open source model – instead of locking down materials in formalized textbooks, we believe that course books can be free (as in free speech) for everyone to access and, equally important, build upon.
Using H2O, professors can freely pull together materials for a course by selecting cases, editing those cases to the sections that are most relevant, and grouping them into readings. Once the materials are assembled, they can be copied in part or in whole by other interested faculty and then edited further. H2O has been successfully piloted in JZ’s 1L Torts class, and will be rolling out further over the coming year.
H2O’s project manager will play a leading role in shepherding H2O into its next phase, which will focus on developing new materials and incorporating additional features, in order to expand the platform beyond its law school roots.
H2O is a joint project of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and the Harvard Law School library. The Project Manager will be housed at the HLS Library and work in close collaboration with lead members of the Library Innovation Lab team; he/she will also work closely with the Berkman Center and current H2O teams. More info and job posting here.
- Meme patrol: “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”
I participated in the Berkman Center’s fascinating HyperPublic symposium in the summer of 2011. When moderating a panel I invoked the aphorism that “When something online is free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product.” It’s a way of encapsulating the idea that online free services usually make money by extracting lots of data from users — and then selling that data, or using it for targeted availability of those users for advertising, to advertisers. In that sense, the advertisers are the clients, and the users enjoying free content are what’s being sold. (Of course, sometimes that happens even when the user pays.)
I didn’t coin the phrase, and since it was featured (and attributed to me!) in wordsmith.org’s wildly popular “word a day” as a thought for the day accompanying the word “enceinte” — I sought to nail down its provenance.
The first use of the quote that we can find is as a comment within the famed MetaFilter community in August 2010. The user’s name is blue_beetle, who might be someone named Andrew Lewis. It’s entirely possible I saw it there, as MeFi is one of my five favorite sites on the Web.
Similar sentiments (whether drawn from that source or independently invented) have been expressed by Bruce Schneier in October 2010 and by Douglas Rushkoff in September ’11.
The phrase “you’re the product” also apparently appeared in a 1986 speech by President Reagan about the drug war.
Just say know.
–KA and JZ
- OS X Mountain Lion and Gatekeeper
This week, Apple announced that it was moving to a new, faster OS X operating system development cycle, starting with the release of Mountain Lion next summer. It previewed a number of features for the OS, and released some parts in beta.
Mountain Lion is slated to include a feature called Gatekeeper as part of the security and privacy settings. Gatekeeper allows administrators (those with full privileges on a Mac) to limit the applications that can run on the Mac. They can choose among allowing apps downloaded from the Mac App Store only, or apps from outside the Store so long as they are digitally signed to Apple’s satisfaction by their developers, or apps from anywhere. (The latter has been the way both Mac and Windows PCs have worked, for better or worse, since the introduction of the Apple II in 1977.) Read more »
- GPS-based Insurance Rates: The Devil is in the (Data) Details
A British insurance company called Motaquote has teamed up with TomTom, the GPS manufacturer to offer insurance prices based on data gathered by GPS. Fair Pay Insurance, Motaquote’s new program, is an opt-in insurance pricing scheme where drivers will get a free GPS unit in return for potentially lower (but possibly higher) premiums. The GPS unit will provide all the traditional navigational services as well as warn drivers when they corner too sharply or brake too hard. Read more »
July 28th, 2008 at 9:00 am (#)
While it would have been nice for Scrabulous to have named itself “rainbows and buttercups” or to have created an application that operated within the bounds of fair use, that is not what happened in this case. Scrabulous purposefully set itself up to look and feel like Scrabble, and by doing so gained a following of users. I am all for supporting generative technologies, but when that technology violates intellectual property laws it seems completely understandable to use legal and non-legal means to protect your interest.
True, it is unfortunate that Facebook is able to kill the app so readily, but their unwillingness to do so shows one of the safeguards of non-generative technologies. Facebook knows that there are hundreds of thousands of users using the Scrabulous application, and they know that if they kill the app, it isn’t Hasbro that is going to get the brunt of users’ attacks. Users are going to complain directly to Facebook.
I appreciate your concerns in general, but in this case it seems that users desire to use Scrabulous will force Hasbro to pursue its case in the courts, which is just where they should be pursuing it. If the courts find that Scrabulous has in fact violated Hasbro’s intellectual property rights, Scrabulous should be removed—as I’m sure it will be.
July 28th, 2008 at 9:47 am (#)
I publish a board game GiftTRAP ( http://www.gifttrap.com/ ) and I’d be happy if someone was creating half a million conversations about my brand every day.
Hasbro and Mattel have benefited from sales increases due to the born again popularity of their cash-cow game. They sell over a million copies a year when really nobody really needs another copy.
I’m sure word games are seeing a resurgence. I know Bananagrams is selling well in stores and they are about to release a Facebook app, no doubt to try and grab a bunch of Scrabulous users.
Creating a loyal following like Scrabulous is an impressive achievement, I have total respect for the Scrabulous guys.
We created a Facebook app in the vein of Free Gifts to help promote our game but getting your social app moving is no mean feat. Translating a board game to an online game is far from obvious.
The Free Gifts apps get 100k daily active users on Facebook, which is pretty cool. Our board game precedes the whole virtual gift tend, but it’s all about timing and reach.
Check out our app here; http://apps.new.facebook.com/gifttrap/
Unlike the Free Gifts app your friend gets to choose their own gift, the question is will you match. We have turned virtual gifts into a game a bit like Secret Santa.
The GiftTRAP board game is on sale in Barnes and Noble right now which is pretty cool (no doubt next to Scrabble and Bananagrams).
I hope Facebook doesn’t drop Scrabulous. My sense is they will, but it’s hard to call.
It will be interesting to see what people do over time.
Stuff that takes off on the web seems to have an edge to it and a legal copy of Scrabble might not have that. The whole thing could have peaked, but I’m guessing not.